Compare Ratios: the fastest way to check a match
This matters because eyeballing two ratios is unreliable once the numbers stop being round. It's obvious that 2:1 and 4:2 match. It's much less obvious whether 2560:1440 and 1920:1080 describe the same aspect ratio — they do (both reduce to 16:9) — or whether 1366:768 belongs to the same family (it doesn't reduce cleanly to 16:9; it's close but not identical). Rather than manually reducing both ratios to lowest terms and comparing, the Compare Ratios field checks the cross products directly and gives a definitive equal/not-equal answer.
Workflow: matching photo crops and screen resolutions
A common situation: you have a photo cropped at one resolution and need to confirm a second export, thumbnail, or monitor size uses the same aspect ratio before resizing — because resizing to a different ratio means either cropping content or stretching the image.
2560:1440 as the main ratio and 1920:1080 as the comparison in Compare Ratios — both reduce to 16:9, so they match. Then switch to the Aspect Ratio / Resolution tool, select 16:9 (or type a custom ratio), enter width = 1280, leave height blank, and it solves height = 1280 × (9/16) = 720 px — the size that preserves the crop with no distortion.The two tools do different jobs on purpose: Compare Ratios answers "do these two known sizes share a ratio," while Aspect Ratio / Resolution answers "given the ratio, what's the missing dimension." Used together, they cover both ends of a resizing task — verifying the source is consistent, then computing the target size.
Workflow: comparing two package deals or unit rates
This reframes a "which pack is the better deal" question as exactly the same math as the aspect-ratio check above — it's still just two ratios being compared. For example, a 12-unit pack priced at $18 is the ratio 12:18; a 20-unit pack priced at $28.50 is 20:28.5. Entering 12:18 as the main ratio and 20:28.5 as the comparison ratio checks whether the cross products (12 × 28.5 = 342, versus 18 × 20 = 360) are equal — they aren't, so the two deals are not priced at the same rate per unit, and whichever ratio simplifies to a larger units-per-dollar value is the better buy. These are illustrative figures only, not a real advertised price.
The same setup works for comparing recipe concentrations, sports statistics (shots-to-goals across two players), or any other "is A:B the same rate as C:D" question — the comparison logic doesn't care what the units represent.
Advanced tips for both tools
- Simplify first when the numbers are large. Compare Ratios works fine on large numbers directly, but simplifying each ratio in a separate pass first (e.g., reducing 2560:1440 to 16:9 before comparing) makes it easier to sanity-check the result by eye.
- Use the "Custom" option in Aspect Ratio / Resolution for non-standard ratios. The dropdown covers common presets like 16:9 and 9:16, but the custom field accepts any ratio (for example, a specific print size like 5:7) and solves for the missing dimension the same way.
- Decimal ratios are fine in Compare Ratios. You don't need whole numbers — a price-per-unit comparison with decimal prices (like 20:28.5 above) works the same as a whole-number ratio; just use a period for the decimal point.
- Direction matters in a comparison. Keep the same order (quantity:price or width:height) in both ratios you're comparing — flipping the order in only one of them will make an actually-equal pair look unequal, since cross multiplication is order-sensitive.